The purpose of the note reading is to extract from a very concise summary of the article (one page) a discussion point (maximum two) on which you will have to confront the views of authors those that you can draw elsewhere (other readings, prior knowledge) to generate your own conclusion.

Please respect this process, which requires you to discuss the text in his heart. A simple synthetic summary of the text will not fit. Personal reflection would hardly refer to the text or otherwise cling to a marginal point would not be appropriate either.

More detail.

- The executive summary must not so much seek to collect all points of the article to produce a reading "oriented" on what constitutes the heart. You need it to identify his problem (so the central question) and the result (conclusion) that follows, leaving everything else aside.

- The (or) point (s) ensuing discussion are - keep it well - on the heart of the argument developed by the author (s) (s). He (s) must (s) may be identifiable from a single glance by the reader: the title of the second part of the note should be made to that effect.

- The comment you produce should naturally be based on your prior learning.

- The note should resume in the final bibliography of all references cited in the commentary (but only them) in accordance with the editorial standards. If you should have to mention more than 5 sources, you may (e) to exceed a little part of three pages.

I hope it's going to be useful

thank you

VN: F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 9.7 / 10 (3 votes cast)
VN: F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Methodology note reading? based on 3 ratings for my friends and students, 9.7 out of 10 based on 3 ratings